A Delhi court has said the Congress leader deserved the "benefit of doubt" in an anti-Sikh riots case as one of the victims and key witness did not name him as an accused. | |||
| |||
| |||
|
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Sajjan Kumar gets benefit of doubt as victim didn't name him in 1985
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment